Piskunov, 18 OCB2d 8 (BCB 2025)
Petitioner, pro se, appealed the determination of the Executive Secretary of the Board of Collective Bargaining dismissing his petition as untimely. Petitioner argued that his claims were timely because he had not yet received a final determination from DCAS regarding his suspension without pay and the Union had not filed a grievance or responded to all of his emails. The Board found that the Executive Secretary properly deemed the petition untimely and denied the appeal.